You have successfully logged out.

Hello !
Logout

Surgical Asset & Supply Consulting

Daily challenges in the CSSD

Medical Professional

This information is meant for medical professionals only. Please confirm that you are a medical professional before accessing the information.

Confirm Yes, I am a health care professional. Cancel No, I am not a health care professional.

Instrument utilization rate 13

Info graph of the instrument utilization rate of 13 %1
Info graph of OR new request of tray means stress and workflow interruption in CSSD
Info graph of instrument condition in a set
Info graph of pinholes in soft wrap means non-sterile and increase risk of SSI
Young CSSD employee with a digital tray organizing management tool on his tablet
Info graph of instrument set before and after set optimization
Info graph of optimized backup stock
Info graph of instruments management system means more transparency, more accuracy and more efficiency
Info graph of shelf-life sterile containers

Face CSSD challenges with Surgical Asset & Supply Consulting

Our consultants advise based on official regulations, international standards, and industry best practices in order to improve the various aspects and overall life cycle of instruments.
Read more

[1] Stockert EW, Langerman A. Assessing the magnitude and costs of intraoperative inefficiencies attributable to surgical instrument trays. J Am Coll Surg 2014;219(4):646-55.

[2] Paula JRdA, Silva RdCRd, Vedovato CA, et al. Instrumentais nas caixas cirúrgicas: avaliação de custo. Rev. Sobecc 2015;20(2):73-80.

[3] Guido Wismer, T.Z. (2013) Handbuch Sterilisation Von der Reinigung bis zur Bereitstellung von Medizinprodukten. Wiesbaden: mhp-Verlag GmbH

[4] Jelks, M.L. An overview of lean transformation in sterile processing. HEALTHCARE Purchasing News 2017:28-31

[5] Jeffreys B (2008). NHS ‘chaos’ over surgical tools. BBC, 24 April 2008.

[6] Aesculap. Data on file.

[7] Lunardini D, Arington R, Canacari EG, et al. Lean principles to optimize instrument utilization for spine surgery in an academic medical center: an opportunity to standardize, cut costs, and build a culture of improvement. Spine 2014;39(20):1714-17.

[8] Waked WR, Simpson AK, Miller CP, et al. Sterilization wrap inspections do not adequately evaluate instrument sterility. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;462:207-11.

[9] Aesculap. Data on file.

[10] Aesculap Sterile Technologies, Real time Event Related 360-day Shelf Life Study: STERILCONTAINER system with PrimeLine Lid, DOC570 Rev. B 3M 9/06.

[11] Aesculap, Sterilization Validation Study, One year Shelf-Life of the STERILCONATINERTM system with BASIC Lid, DOC 173 REV 5M 1/02.

[12] Junghanß U., Winterfeld S., Gabele L., Kulow U., Hygienisch-mikrobiologische und technische Überprüfung von Sterilisier-Containersystemen, Zentralsterilisation 1999, 7 (3):154-162.

[13] Santos, B.M., Fogliatto, F.S., Zani, C.M., & Peres, F.A.P. (2021). Approaches to the rationalization of surgical instrument trays: scoping review and research agenda. BMC Health Services Research, 21, 163.

[14] Chotia, I. (n.d.). Effective Techniques for Wrapping Surgical Instruments. Retrieved from Sterile Processing Technician Schools on January 23, 2024.